Psychosocial work environment and health: new evidence.
نویسنده
چکیده
D espite profound changes in modern working life occupational health research has maintained a rather narrow view of its topic, dealing almost exclusively with physical, chemical, or otherwise material conditions. 2 In view of a substantial body of scientific evidence of adverse effects on health produced by a stressful psychosocial work environment this restriction is no longer justified. 4 The term ‘‘psychosocial work environment’’ has been introduced to delineate the range of sociostructural work related opportunities that is available to an individual person to meet his or her needs of wellbeing, productivity, and positive self experience. Two aspects of positive self experience are of particular importance for wellbeing and health at work: self efficacy and self esteem. The demand-control model of work related stress posits that job tasks characterised by high psychological demands in combination with a low level of decision latitude or task control evoke recurrent stress reactions by suppressing positive experiences of self efficacy. A complementary model of an adverse psychosocial work environment, effort-reward imbalance, is based on the notion of reciprocity of work contracts where effort at work is reciprocated by socially defined rewards that include money, esteem, and status in terms of promotion prospects and job security. Failed contractual reciprocity (an imbalance between high efforts and low rewards at work) adversely affects self esteem and elicits longlasting stress reactions. Both models were shown to predict a range of stress related diseases in employed people. New results from the Whitehall II study of British civil servants published in this issue suggest that health adverse effects of low self esteem at work are not restricted to contractual unfairness but may extend to less specific experiences of relational injustice at work. The main findings of this study show that employees who suffer from inappropriate behaviour of their superiors (relational injustice) are at increased risk of poor self rated health at two subsequent time intervals (after three and six years on average). Moreover, declining organisational justice over time increases the risk of poor health whereas an improvement in justice increases their perceived health. These results give further support to the notion of a health adverse or health promoting psychosocial work environment. In policy terms, they broaden the focus of workplace health intervention to include justice in managerial treatment. Despite these merits the conclusions of the paper by Kivimäki et al deserve some caution. The obvious limitations of this study are mainly attributable to a lack of externally assessed health measures, the use of a proxy measure of organisational justice, and somewhat inconsistent gender specific results. Moreover, the odds ratios of poor self rated health are comparatively modest, ranging from 1.12 to 1.53 in the fully adjusted models. A further unresolved question concerns the role of socioeconomic status in this analysis. Organisational injustice and poor self rated health were both found to be more prevalent in lower status civil servants. Rather than adjusting for rank an analytical strategy seems promising that explores the mediating or modifying role of organisational justice in this context. Similarly, authors adjusted the effects of relational justice on health for the two work stress models, demand-control and effort-reward imbalance. While this is an instructive approach an analysis of combined effects of the models under study is equally important. On conceptual and methodological grounds, the analysis of change of exposure over time and its association with change of health must be considered a special strength of this study. It is now evident that occupational stress research needs to move beyond a single (mostly baseline) assessment of occupational exposure to study its dynamics over time. Recent findings from both work stress models mentioned above support this conclusion. 5 In summary, it is hoped that innovative contributions such as this paper from the Whitehall II research team strengthen the impact of ‘‘new’’ occupational health research for science and policy.
منابع مشابه
Effect on mental health of a participatory intervention to improve psychosocial work environment: a cluster randomized controlled trial among nurses.
OBJECTIVES Improvement of psychosocial work environment has proved to be valuable for workers' mental health. However, limited evidence is available for the effectiveness of participatory interventions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect on mental health among nurses of a participatory intervention to improve the psychosocial work environment. METHODS A cluster randomized...
متن کاملStandardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers' health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria based on specific medical evaluation of work-related health outcomes and the use of validated instru...
متن کاملMeasuring psychosocial exposures: validation of the Persian of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ)
Background: The effect of psychosocial work environment on personal and organizational aspects of employees is well-known and it is of fundamental importance to have valid tools to evaluate them. This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Methods : The questionnaire was translated into Persian and then b...
متن کاملInteractions between lean management and the psychosocial work environment in a hospital setting – a multi-method study
BACKGROUND As health care struggles to meet increasing demands with limited resources, Lean has become a popular management approach. It has mainly been studied in relation to health care performance. The empirical evidence as to how Lean affects the psychosocial work environment has been contradictory. This study aims to study the interaction between Lean and the psychosocial work environment ...
متن کاملDOES THE PSYCHOSOCIAL SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT MATTER FOR HEALTH? A study of pupils in Swedish compulsory school from a gender perspective
Despite the fast-growing evidence of the importance of the psychosocial work environment for the health of adults there is a lack of research about the possible health effects of the work environment among pupils, that is, their school environment. This is especially true for the psychosocial aspects of the pupils' school situation. The overall aim of this thesis was to analyse the importance o...
متن کاملAn Assessment of Work Ability, Psychosocial Status, and the Quality of Life among Physiotherapists in Lagos State, 2017
Background: There are many factors affecting work ability among health practitioners, but none has been investigated among physiotherapists in Nigeria. This study investigated the correlation among work ability, psychosocial status, and the quality of life among physiotherapists in Lagos State, Southwestern Nigeria. Materials & Methods: A survey was carried out among 111 physiotherapists (52 ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of epidemiology and community health
دوره 58 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004